Rockchip rk3399 vs intel. The Intel Celeron N5105 was started more recently.
Rockchip rk3399 vs intel Intel Celeron N3160 vs Rockchip RK3399 Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the Intel Celeron N3160 on one side and the Rockchip RK3399 on the other side. Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the Intel Core i3-3217U on one side and the Rockchip RK3399 on the other side, also their respective performances with the benchmarks. Performance comparison with the benchmarks: Performance and price comparison graphs for Rockchip RK3399. The processor Rockchip RK3399 has a larger number of cores, the maximum frequency of Intel Pentium E5700 is greater, that the thermal dissipation power of Rockchip RK3399 is less. Your benchmarks seem to give a slight edge to 3566 devices, but consumer benchmarks like Geekbench say the older 3399 is more powerful and by a fair bit. 10GHz and is significantly faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing, it is around 22% faster in single-thread testing. The Rockchip RK3588 was started more recently. 00GHz is around 16% faster in single-thread testing. Compare the technical characteristics between the processor Rockchip RK3399 and the group of processors NXP. The values below were tabulated from a combined 2125 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and The processor Rockchip RK3399 has more cores, the turbo frequency of Intel Celeron J1800 is bigger, that the PDT of Rockchip RK3399 is lower. Performance comparison with the benchmarks: The processor Rockchip RK3399 has a larger number of cores, the maximum frequency of Intel Pentium G4400 is greater, that the thermal dissipation power of Rockchip RK3399 is less. 10GHz is around 6% faster in single-thread testing. This is made using thousands of PerformanceTest benchmark results and is updated daily. The Amlogic S905L3A was started more recently. Explore Rockchip RK3399 VS Intel N100 comparison for essential information about them. Performance comparison with the benchmarks: The processor Rockchip RK3399 has more cores, the maximum frequency of Rockchip RK3399 is greater, that the thermal dissipation power of Intel Atom Z3735F is less. Performance comparison with the benchmarks: The processor Rockchip RK3399 has more cores, the maximum frequency of Rockchip RK3399 is greater, that the thermal dissipation power of Rockchip RK3566 is less. 10GHz and is significantly faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing, but Intel Celeron N4000 @ 1. The processor Rockchip RK3399 has more cores, the turbo frequency of Intel Core i3-2100 is bigger, that the PDT of Rockchip RK3399 is lower. Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the Rockchip RK3399 on one side and the Intel Core i7-2700K on the other side, also their respective performances with the benchmarks. The processor Rockchip RK3399 has a larger number of cores, the maximum frequency of Intel Celeron N2840 is greater, that the thermal dissipation power of Rockchip RK3399 is less. Rockchip RK3399-T vs Intel Core i5-6000 Compare the technical characteristics between the processor Rockchip RK3399-T and the group of processors Intel Core i5-6000. Performance comparison with the benchmarks: Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the Intel Celeron N3350 on one side and the Rockchip RK3399 on the other side, also their respective performances with the benchmarks. Rockchip RK3399 vs Intel Core i3-4005U Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the Rockchip RK3399 on one side and the Intel Core i3-4005U on the other side. The Intel Core i5-8259U was designed earlier. The processor Rockchip RK3399 has more cores, the turbo frequency of Intel Celeron J4105 is bigger, that the PDT of Rockchip RK3399 is lower. Performance comparison with the benchmarks: The Rockchip RK3399 is newer than Intel Celeron N4000 @ 1. $100 SBC and Desktop are difficult to do together without concessions. Performance comparison with the benchmarks: The processor Rockchip RK3399 has more cores, the turbo frequency of Intel Celeron J6412 is bigger, that the PDT of Rockchip RK3399 is lower. Performance comparison with the benchmarks: The processor Rockchip RK3399 has a larger number of cores, the turbo frequency of Rockchip RK3399 is bigger, that the PDT of Intel Atom x5-Z8350 is lower. The Intel Celeron J4105 was started more recently. I'm in the market for a sub-$100 SBC to run as a light-duty desktop replacement. Intel Core i5-1235U: 43. Rockchip RK3399 vs Intel Core i7-6900K Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the Rockchip RK3399 on one side and the Intel Core i7-6900K on the other side. Performance comparison with the benchmarks: Rockchip RK3399-T vs Intel Processor N100 Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the Rockchip RK3399-T on one side and the Intel Processor N100 on the other side. The processor Rockchip RK3399 has more cores, the turbo frequency of Intel Celeron N2930 is bigger, that the PDT of Rockchip RK3399 is lower. Compare the technical characteristics between the processor Rockchip RK3399 and the group of processors Intel Celeron. The processor Rockchip RK3399 has a larger number of cores, the maximum frequency of Intel Celeron J3455 is greater, that the thermal dissipation power of Rockchip RK3399 is less. The Rockchip RK3528 was designed earlier. The Rockchip RK3399 is newer than Intel Celeron N3350 @ 1. Performance comparison with the benchmarks: The processor Rockchip RK3399-T has a larger number of cores, the maximum frequency of Intel Core i3-8100 is greater, that the thermal dissipation power of Rockchip RK3399-T is less. The processor Rockchip RK3399 has a larger number of cores, the turbo frequency of Rockchip RK3399 is bigger, that the PDT of Intel Atom N280 is lower. The Rockchip RK3399 was designed earlier. 80 GHz 1 Processor, 6 Cores Processor ID: ARM implementer 65 architecture 8 variant 4 part 3339 revision 0: ARM implementer 65 architecture 8 variant 0 part 3336 Oct 28, 2023 · But my concerns about these low-power x86 Intel chips are: Intel applied various software-based workarounds to mitigate security vulnerabilities at the expense of performance on 6-11th gen chips. 2, Vulkan 1. 0GHz. The processor Rockchip RK3399 has more cores, the turbo frequency of Intel Pentium Silver N6005 is bigger, that the PDT of Rockchip RK3399 is lower. Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the Rockchip RK3399 on one side and the Intel Core i5-9400 on the other side, also their respective performances with the benchmarks. 5GHz. Release dates, price and performance comparisons are also listed when available. Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the Rockchip RK3399 on one side and the Intel Celeron N4020 on the other side, also their respective performances with the benchmarks. The values below were tabulated from a combined 3613 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software The Rockchip RK3588 is newer than Intel Celeron N4020 @ 1. The Intel N100 is newer than Rockchip RK3588 also around 20% faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing, it is around 23% faster in single-thread testing. The processor Rockchip RK3399 has a larger number of cores, the maximum frequency of Intel Celeron N3450 is greater, that the PDT of Intel Celeron N3450 is lower. Both were produced in the same year. 78: Rockchip RK3399 Generic Dec 16, 2021 · The results for Geekbench 4 reveal around 2. The CPUs selected in this comparison belong in different CPU Classes: Mobile/Embedded, Laptop. The processor Rockchip RK3399 has more cores, the maximum frequency of Rockchip RK3399 is greater, that the thermal dissipation power of Intel Atom Z2560 is less. The Intel Celeron J4105 was designed earlier. The Intel Celeron J4125 was designed earlier. Oct 26, 2017 · I was expecting a close fight between Rockchip RK3399 and Celeron J3455, but RK3399 only has two fast Cortex A72 cores against four x86 cores in the Intel Apollo Lake SoC. 0, AI interfaces support TensorFlow Lite/AndroidNN API. The processor Rockchip RK3399 has more cores, the turbo frequency of Intel Core i3-5010U is bigger, that the PDT of Rockchip RK3399 is lower. rk3399 tops out at 4GB RAM. Jean-Luc Aufranc (CNXSoft) Jean-Luc started CNX Software in 2010 as a part-time endeavor, before quitting his job as a software engineering manager, and starting to write Intel i5-560M vs i5-3230M vs Rockchip RK3399 vs BCM2711 The CPUs selected in this comparison belong in different CPU Classes: Laptop, Mobile/Embedded. Comparison between Rockchip RK3399 and Intel Core i7-10000 with the specifications of the processors, the number of cores, threads, cache memory, also the performance in benchmark platforms such as Geekbench, Passmark, Cinebench or AnTuTu. Came here from a Google search, I'm trying to figure out the performance of the RK3566 vs the older RK3399. The information herein is subject to change The processor Rockchip RK3399-T has a larger number of cores, the maximum frequency of Intel Pentium Gold 5405U is greater, that the thermal dissipation power of Rockchip RK3399-T is less. 0, OpenCL 1. The Intel Pentium Silver N6005 was started more recently. com, and you will se the difference between the two processors. The processor Rockchip RK3399 has a larger number of cores, the maximum frequency of Intel Celeron N4000 is greater, that the PDT of Intel Celeron N4000 is lower. Performance comparison with the benchmarks: The processor Rockchip RK3399 has more cores, the turbo frequency of Intel Core i3-1005G1 is bigger, that the PDT of Rockchip RK3399 is lower. The Rockchip RK3288 is newer than Rockchip RK3399, while Rockchip RK3399 is significantly faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing, it is around 22% faster in single-thread testing. On 27 May 2014, Intel announced an agreement with Rockchip to adopt the Intel architecture for entry-level tablets. The Intel Core i3-8130U was designed earlier. We also have a comparison of the respective performance with benchmarks, such as PassMark, AnTuTu if available, Cinebench, CPU-Z, and Geekbench. The processor Rockchip RK3399 has more cores, the maximum frequency of Rockchip RK3399 is greater, that the thermal dissipation power of Rockchip RK3328 is less. The processor Rockchip RK3399 has more cores, the turbo frequency of Intel Core m7-6Y75 is bigger, that the thermal dissipation power of Intel Core m7-6Y75 is less. May 1, 2022 · In terms of modern chips its still likely to struggle against a Intel Celeron N4020 but we will have to see how the faster single cores vs more cores pans out in use. , Ltd. The nearest thing is prob something like a LENOVO CHROMEBOOK DUET as it has a Mediatek Helio P60T which it should beat but prob not by that much. The Intel Core i3-8100T was started more recently. The values below were tabulated from a combined 2290 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions. The processor Rockchip RK3399 has a larger number of cores, the maximum frequency of Intel Celeron J4105 is greater, that the thermal dissipation power of Rockchip RK3399 is less. Rockchip RK3399 Technical specifications and performance with the benchmarks of the Rockchip RK3399 processor dedicated to the single-board computer sector, it has 6 cores, 6 threads, a maximum frequency of 2. Comparison between Rockchip RK3399 and Intel Celeron J4125 with the specifications of the processors, the number of cores, threads, cache memory, also the performance in benchmark platforms such as Geekbench, Passmark, Cinebench or AnTuTu. 71: Rockchip RK3399: NA: Intel Pentium Silver N6005 @ 2 AMD vs Intel Market Share; Year on Year Performance Qualcomm Technologies, Inc SDM845 vs Rockchip RK3588: 3,376 (-23. ASUS Chromebook Flip C101 2-In-1 Laptop- 10. The processor Rockchip RK3399 has a larger number of cores, the turbo frequency of Rockchip RK3399 is bigger, that the thermal dissipation power of Rockchip RK3399 is less. Comparing Rockchip RK3288 vs Rockchip RK3399. The Intel Processor N100 was started more recently. Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the Rockchip RK3399 on one side and the Intel Core i3-5005U on the other side, also their respective performances with the benchmarks. 79: Rockchip RK3399: NA: Intel Pentium Silver N6005 @ 2 Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the Intel Core i3-4005U on one side and the Rockchip RK3399 on the other side, also their respective performances with the benchmarks. The processor Rockchip RK3399 has more cores, the turbo frequency of Intel Celeron N5105 is bigger, that the PDT of Rockchip RK3399 is lower. Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the Rockchip RK3399 on one side and the Intel Celeron J1900 on the other side, also their respective performances with the benchmarks. The Intel Celeron N5095 was started more recently. Fantastic for many other SBC uses. The Intel Celeron 3955U was designed earlier. Intel Core i5 vs Rockchip RK3399 Compare the technical characteristics between the group of processors Intel Core i5 and the processor Rockchip RK3399. The processor Rockchip RK3399 has more cores, the turbo frequency of Intel Core i5-7200U is bigger, that the PDT of Rockchip RK3399 is lower. Intel N100 vs Rockchip RK3399 vs N97 vs Celeron N3350 vs Celeron N4500 The CPUs selected in this comparison belong in different CPU Classes: Mobile/Embedded, Laptop. The processor Rockchip RK3399 has a larger number of cores, the maximum frequency of Intel Pentium 4405U is greater, that the thermal dissipation power of Rockchip RK3399 is less. Performance comparison with the benchmarks: Rockchip RK3399 vs Intel Celeron J3455 Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the Rockchip RK3399 on one side and the Intel Celeron J3455 on the other side. The processor Rockchip RK3399 has a larger number of cores, the maximum frequency of Intel Celeron N4100 is greater, that the PDT of Intel Celeron N4100 is lower. The Intel Core i3-1005G1 was started more recently. The processor Rockchip RK3399 has more cores, the maximum frequency of Rockchip RK3399 is greater, that the thermal dissipation power of Intel Atom x5-Z8300 is less. 10GHz CPU benchmark comparison on CPUBM. The Rockchip RK3328 was started more recently. Performance comparison with the benchmarks: The processor Rockchip RK3399-T has more cores, the turbo frequency of Intel Celeron N3450 is bigger, that the thermal dissipation power of Intel Celeron N3450 is less. 1” 4-Way WXGA Touchscreen, Rockchip RK3399 Quad-Core Processor, 4GB RAM, 16GB Storage, All Metal Body, Lightweight, USB Type-C, Chrome OS- C101PA-DB02 $499. The Rockchip RK3399-T was started more recently. The processor Rockchip RK3399 has more cores, the maximum frequency of Rockchip RK3399 is greater, that the thermal dissipation power of Intel Atom x5-Z8350 is less. 1/1. 10GHz comparison for essential information about them. The processor Rockchip RK3399 has more cores, the turbo frequency of Intel Celeron N5095 is bigger, that the PDT of Rockchip RK3399 is lower. Watch the Rockchip RK3399 VS Intel Celeron N3350 @ 1. Performance comparison with the benchmarks: Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the Intel Atom x5-E3940 on one side and the Rockchip RK3399 on the other side, also their respective performances with the benchmarks. Performance comparison with the benchmarks: The processor Rockchip RK3399 has more cores, the turbo frequency of Intel Atom x5-Z8500 is bigger, that the thermal dissipation power of Intel Atom x5-Z8500 is less. Performance comparison with the benchmarks: The processor Rockchip RK3399 has more cores, the turbo frequency of Intel Core i3-6100U is bigger, that the PDT of Rockchip RK3399 is lower. 80 GHz 1 Processor, 8 Cores ARM ARMv8 @ 1. The CPUs selected in this comparison belong in different CPU Classes: Laptop, Mobile/Embedded. The processor Rockchip RK3399-T has a larger number of cores, the maximum frequency of Intel Core i5-3230M is greater, that the thermal dissipation power of Rockchip RK3399-T is less. RK3399 was the flagship SoC of Rockchip, Dual A72 and Quad A53 and Mali-T860MP4 GPU, providing high computing and multi-media performance, rich interfaces and peripherals. The processor Rockchip RK3399 has a larger number of cores, the turbo frequency of Rockchip RK3399 is bigger, that the PDT of Intel Atom Z3745 is lower. Intel Core i5-1235U: 42. The Intel Core i5-8250U was designed earlier. Comparison between Rockchip RK3399 and Intel Core i9 with the specifications of the processors, the number of cores, threads, cache memory, also the perform List of comparisons between Rockchip RK3399 and ARM Cortex-A72, with some of their technical information and for each comparison a link to a table to better differentiate their specificities and their performance. The processor Rockchip RK3399 has more cores, the turbo frequency of Intel Core i3-7100U is bigger, that the PDT of Rockchip RK3399 is lower. [3] Rockchip is a supplier of SoCs to Chinese white-box tablet manufacturers [9] [10] [11] as well as supplying OEMs such as Asus, [12] [13] HP, [14 The processor Rockchip RK3399 has a larger number of cores, they have a similar turbo frequency, that the thermal dissipation power of Rockchip RK3399 is less. The processor Rockchip RK3399-T has a larger number of cores, the maximum frequency of Intel Pentium G4400 is greater, that the thermal dissipation power of Rockchip RK3399-T is less. The processor Rockchip RK3399 has more cores, the turbo frequency of Intel Processor N100 is bigger, that the thermal dissipation power of Intel Processor N100 is less. Rockchip RK3588 vs Intel Celeron N5105 vs Pentium Silver N6005 The CPUs selected in this comparison belong in different CPU Classes: Mobile/Embedded, Laptop. Benchmarks for the Rockchip RK3399 can be found below. 2, OpenVX1. The processor Rockchip RK3399 has more cores, the turbo frequency of Intel Core i3-8100T is bigger, that the PDT of Rockchip RK3399 is lower. Performance comparison with the benchmarks: The processor Rockchip RK3399 has more cores, the turbo frequency of Intel Celeron J3355 is bigger, that the PDT of Rockchip RK3399 is lower. The processor Rockchip RK3399 has more cores, the turbo frequency of Intel Pentium J3710 is bigger, that the thermal dissipation power of Intel Pentium J3710 is less. The Broadcom BCM2711 was started more recently. The values below were tabulated from a combined 1249 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and The processor Rockchip RK3399 has more cores, the turbo frequency of Intel Celeron N3060 is bigger, that the thermal dissipation power of Intel Celeron N3060 is less. The CPUs selected in this comparison belong in different CPU Classes: Desktop, Mobile/Embedded. 7 times (single core) or 3. (“Rockchip”) may make changes to any information in this document at any time without any prior notice. Rockchip RK3399 vs Intel Core i5-10000 Compare the technical characteristics between the processor Rockchip RK3399 and the group of processors Intel Core i5-10000. The Rockchip RK3588S was started more recently. The processor Rockchip RK3399 has more cores, the turbo frequency of Intel Core m3-6Y30 is bigger, that the thermal dissipation power of Intel Core m3-6Y30 is less. Performance comparison with the benchmarks: The processor Rockchip RK3399 has a larger number of cores, the maximum frequency of Intel Celeron J4125 is greater, that the thermal dissipation power of Rockchip RK3399 is less. Comparison between Rockchip RK3399 and Rockchip RK3568 with the specifications of the processors, the number of cores, threads, cache memory, also the perfo GadgetVersus Smartphone Processor Graphics card The processor Rockchip RK3399 has a larger number of cores, the turbo frequency of Rockchip RK3399 is bigger, that the thermal dissipation power of Rockchip RK3399 is less. Intel Core 2 Duo E7300: 280 660: Intel Core 2 Duo E7400: 325 656: Intel Pentium E6300: 349 650: Intel Atom x5-Z8350: 202 635: Intel Core 2 Duo E7200: 326 626: Rockchip RK3399: 269 615: Intel Core 2 Duo E4300: 338 601: Intel Pentium E5400: 299 593: Intel Core 2 Duo E6400: 317 582: Intel Celeron J3160: 171 581: Intel Pentium G620: 343 566 The processor Rockchip RK3399 has a larger number of cores, the turbo frequency of Rockchip RK3399 is bigger, that the PDT of Rockchip RK3528 is lower. The Intel Celeron N4100 was designed earlier. 2%) vendor Kirin985 vs Rockchip RK3588: 5,481 List of comparisons of technical characteristics between the processor Rockchip RK3399 and the processors group Intel Atom, with also the respective performance in the benchmarks. The processor Rockchip RK3399-T has more cores, the turbo frequency of Intel Atom x5-Z8350 is bigger, that the thermal dissipation power of Intel Atom x5-Z8350 is less. The Intel Celeron J6412 was started more recently. Performance comparison with the benchmarks: The processor Rockchip RK3399 has more cores, the maximum frequency of Rockchip RK3399 is greater, that the thermal dissipation power of Intel Atom x5-Z8300 is less. The values below were tabulated from a combined 7649 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and The processor Rockchip RK3399 has more cores, the turbo frequency of Intel Celeron N3150 is bigger, that the thermal dissipation power of Intel Celeron N3150 is less. The first is dedicated to the single-board computer sector, It has 6 cores, 6 threads, a maximum frequency of 2. 4 times (multi-core) higher CPU speed, but the most impressive part is the GPU as GFXBench shows Rockchip RK3588 being multiple times faster than RK3399, in some cases over 10 times faster. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Mobile/Embedded CPU Class. Performance comparison with the benchmarks: Comparison between Rockchip RK3399 and Rockchip RK3576 with the specifications of the processors, the number of cores, threads, cache memory, also the perfo GadgetVersus Smartphone Processor Graphics card The processor Rockchip RK3399-T has a larger number of cores, the maximum frequency of Intel Atom E3845 is greater, that the thermal dissipation power of Rockchip RK3399-T is less. Rockchip RK3399 Intel Equivalent Rockchip RK3399 AMD Equivalent Unisoc Tiger T820 Intel Equivalent Unisoc Tiger T820 AMD Equivalent See also: Rockchip RK3399-T Rockchip RK3399Pro Rockchip RK3399S Smartphones with the processor Unisoc Tiger T820: Blackview Shark 9 ZTE nubia Neo 2 5G ZTE nubia Neo 5G. Sep 26, 2024 · Performance and price comparison graphs for Rockchip RK3399 Generic Board edp (Android) Intel Core i5-1235U: 43. The processor Rockchip RK3399 has more cores, the turbo frequency of Intel Celeron J3160 is bigger, that the thermal dissipation power of Intel Celeron J3160 is less. The processor Rockchip RK3399 has a larger number of cores, the maximum frequency of Intel Celeron J1900 is greater, that the thermal dissipation power of Rockchip RK3399 is less. Intel Celeron N5105 vs N100 vs Rockchip RK3399 vs Rockchip RK3588 All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Mobile/Embedded CPU Class. The processor Rockchip RK3399 has a larger number of cores, the maximum frequency of Intel Core i5-8259U is greater, that the thermal dissipation power of Rockchip RK3399 is less. The Intel Pentium Silver J5005 was started more recently. The first is dedicated to the single-board computer sector, It has 6 cores, 6 threads, a maximum frequency of 1. The BCM2711 is newer than Rockchip RK3399, while Rockchip RK3399 is significantly faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing, it is around 38% faster in single-thread testing. The processor Rockchip RK3399 has more cores, the turbo frequency of Intel Celeron N3160 is bigger, that the thermal dissipation power of Intel Celeron N3160 is less. And software supports multiple APIs: OpenGL ES 3. The Intel Processor N100 was designed earlier. 99 Mar 23, 2020 · Fuzhou Rockchip Electronics Co. The Rockchip RK3566 was started more recently. The Broadcom BCM2712 was designed earlier. The Rockchip RK3399 was started more recently. Have to guess that the same thing might happen on these 12th gen chips in the future. The Intel Celeron N4000 was designed earlier. The processor Rockchip RK3588S has a larger number of cores, the turbo frequency of Rockchip RK3588S is bigger, that the PDT of Rockchip RK3399 is lower. The Intel Pentium G4560T was started more recently. The values below were tabulated from a combined 75 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest The processor Rockchip RK3399 has more cores, the turbo frequency of Intel Pentium G4560T is bigger, that the PDT of Rockchip RK3399 is lower. The Rockchip RK3399-T was designed earlier. The company established cooperation with Google, [7] Microsoft [8] and Intel. Comparison between Rockchip RK3399 and Amlogic S922X with the specifications of the processors, the number of cores, threads, cache memory, also the perform GadgetVersus Smartphone Processor Graphics card The processor Rockchip RK3588 has a larger number of cores, the turbo frequency of Rockchip RK3588 is bigger, that the PDT of Rockchip RK3399 is lower. Consider, selecting CPUs from simliar CPU Class for more apt comparison. The processor Rockchip RK3399 has a larger number of cores, the maximum frequency of Intel Core m5-6Y54 is greater, that the PDT of Intel Core m5-6Y54 is lower. The processor Rockchip RK3399 has more cores, the maximum frequency of Rockchip RK3399 is greater, that the PDT of Rockchip RK3399 is lower. Rockchip RK3399 vs Intel Core i5-6000 Compare the technical characteristics between the processor Rockchip RK3399 and the group of processors Intel Core i5-6000. The processor Rockchip RK3399 has a larger number of cores, the maximum frequency of Intel Core i3-8130U is greater, that the thermal dissipation power of Rockchip RK3399 is less. Performance comparison with the benchmarks: The Rockchip RK3399 is newer than Intel Celeron J4125 @ 2. Explore Rockchip RK3399 VS Intel Celeron N3350 @ 1. 00GHz, while the multi-threaded (CPU Mark) is simliar, Intel Celeron J4125 @ 2. The processor Rockchip RK3399 has a larger number of cores, the maximum frequency of Broadcom BCM2712 is greater, that the thermal dissipation power of Rockchip RK3399 is less. It is what is used for the Pinebook Pro and is barely usable as a desktop. Watch the Rockchip RK3399 VS Intel N100 CPU benchmark comparison on CPUBM. The processor Rockchip RK3399 has more cores, the turbo frequency of Intel Celeron N3050 is bigger, that the thermal dissipation power of Intel Celeron N3050 is less. Rockchip RK3399 vs Intel Atom Compare the technical characteristics between the processor Rockchip RK3399 and the group of processors Intel Atom. Comparison between Rockchip RK3399 and Rockchip RK3399Pro with the specifications of the processors, the number of cores, threads, cache memory, also the pe GadgetVersus Smartphone Processor Graphics card The processor Rockchip RK3399 has more cores, the maximum frequency of Rockchip RK3399 is greater, that the PDT of Rockchip RK3399 is lower. I was bitten by this on my last Intel laptop. The first is dedicated to the entry-level notebook sector, It has 4 cores, 4 threads, a maximum frequency of 2. The processor Rockchip RK3399-T has a larger number of cores, the maximum frequency of Intel Processor N100 is greater, that the PDT of Intel Processor N100 is lower. Performance comparison with the benchmarks: rockchip RK3588 rockchip rk3399; Operating System: Android 12: Android 9: Model: rockchip RK3588: rockchip rk3399: Processor: ARM ARMv8 @ 1. Rockchip RK3399 vs Intel Core i7-1165G7 Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the Rockchip RK3399 on one side and the Intel Core i7-1165G7 on the other side. 2GHz. The processor Rockchip RK3399 has more cores, the maximum frequency of Rockchip RK3399 is greater, that the thermal dissipation power of Amlogic S905L3A is less. 96: Intel N100: 42. Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the Rockchip RK3399 on one side and the Intel Xeon E5-2690 on the other side, also their respective performances with the benchmarks. Performance comparison with the benchmarks: The processor Rockchip RK3399 has more cores, the turbo frequency of Intel Pentium N4200 is bigger, that the thermal dissipation power of Intel Pentium N4200 is less. The processor Rockchip RK3399 has more cores, the turbo frequency of Intel Core i5-6200U is bigger, that the PDT of Rockchip RK3399 is lower. 06: Intel N100: 42. 10GHz and is significantly faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing, it is around 18% faster in single-thread testing. The processor Rockchip RK3399 has a larger number of cores, the maximum frequency of Intel Processor N100 is greater, that the PDT of Intel Processor N100 is lower. The processor Rockchip RK3399 has more cores, the turbo frequency of Intel Pentium Silver J5005 is bigger, that the PDT of Rockchip RK3399 is lower. 18: Intel N100: 42. Performance comparison with the benchmarks: Intel Core i7 vs Rockchip RK3399 Compare the technical characteristics between the group of processors Intel Core i7 and the processor Rockchip RK3399. The Intel Celeron N5105 was started more recently. The processor Rockchip RK3399 has a larger number of cores, the maximum frequency of Intel Core i5-8250U is greater, that the thermal dissipation power of Rockchip RK3399 is less. mhacjf sasnnznp xmk erlgo srpuxw hhbj uxkrl tckica jmvhf druvdo